- All Debates
- Popular Debates
- Active Debates
- New Debates
- Open Challenge Debates
- My Challenge Debates
- Accepted Challenges
- Debate Communities
- Argument Waterfall
- New People
- People by Points
This article is a very nice sample of writing which i have read in recent days. Caregiving is a very nice profession as I check instantassignmenthelp review to provides unique info The people who are old or injured, desperately need these caregivers for their daily life. Thanks for sharing this article with us.
No woman should be forced to keep a baby that they do not want, no matter the circumstance. Even if they created that child with someone that they love very much, even if they have the means to take care of it. No other person should have any say what a woman does with her body, they are just some incubator that their entire life can be put on hold for 5+ years to have and raise a baby that they didn't even want in the first place. How many of you can remember when you were first born? Many people say that you're making the child sad and murdering it, well I mean jesus they can't even process what sadness is when they are like 2 let alone when they are still a fetus in the womb. Unless the government had some sort of plans for paying for each woman's pregnancy process i.e: new pregnancy clothes, vitamins, hospital check ups, whole hospital visit for giving birth, diapers, food, clothes, cribs, schooling, ect. then they have no right to infringe on the choices of the young woman making that hard decision. Having that kid is so much more than just giving birth to it, it is literally committing a good chunk of your life time to it, to care for it and watch it grow.
I feel that the world is not as overtly prejudice, rather it has taken shape into a more passive aggressive form. No longer is it socially acceptable to yell out at someone for being a certain race, religion, or gender, but now if there is a certain cause behind it-henceforth usually religion (Christianity) we will just pass the blame off to some old book and say that it is sin and harass them, rather than hazing or lynching someone. So I would say that prejudice now a days is carried out in more of a "little bitch" manner so to speak. They hide behind the facade of an organized group thinking that they are doing the world a favor or something. Rather than just saying they are racist, or homophobic, or sexist, it's now just something that some guy in the sky told them is right.
In my opinion I highly believe that the world we live today is more prejudging because if anyone has heard few to many people prejudge other people. Many people can see that in written work, TV shows, and real life. If this keeps our next generation might get off on the wrong way of introduction to people.
I prefer fiction because it is not constrained by what has happened. Nonfiction is firmly in the realms of reality. With fiction the story can go anywhere. It can have ludicrous plot twists. Completely unorthodox characters. It can use plot elements that are impossible to us but are absolutely vital to the story at hand. To me the idea of a poet traveling through the 9 circles of Hell is far more interesting than anything that could possibly happen in the real world. I am of course mentioning the Divine Comedy. Not to say that nonfiction cant be exciting. All I'm saying is fiction has the potential to be more exciting.
I beg to differ with your first statement that "...people don't just walk up to a random person and say racial terms to them." This happens on a daily basis, and hasn't changed the slightest in the past fifty years. I would even say that it happens to a wider range of people these days, as the population has significantly increased, and we have a wider range of ethnic groups.
The justice system has also not changed to a completely unbiased state. Juries and Judges still have the potential (just as everyone else) to be racist against any party. I must admit the frequency of this has definitely gone down, but I guarantee you that men, whether white, black, Hispanic, Asian, or other, have been subjected to bias in a courtroom due to their ethnic background.
I prefer non-fiction reading over fiction because i enjoy reading about things that have really happened instead of things that are fake. I would rather be able to read a story and know its true, then have to use my imagination during it. My favorite book series is the "A Child Called I," "The Lost Boy," and "A Man Named Dave."
I prefer fiction due to the fact that it allows you to explore your imagination. It seems like in all non-fiction stories it is all sad, but in fiction you can get into the story and actually wish it was happening to you. Even in the scary or sad fiction stories you can tell yourself that it never happened. Also in the genre fantasy it is called that for a reason. If something is a fantasy something it is something that you enjoy and wish that it could happen to you. It becomes an escape for you from the real world.
I like nonfiction better than fiction because you get a better understanding of what is going on and what really happened in someone's life or in an event. If you want to research a person or an event in history might get a better point of view in a nonfiction book. In fiction books the plot may be harder to understand or follow if the author over exaggerates what they are talking about.
I prefer non-fiction because, its about real life. I believe that when stories are real they are more interesting. Sometimes the stories are even sad which makes me more interesting. When i am reading something that is real life it gets me and little more interested in the story. When you read fiction sometimes the story goes to something that doesn't even make sense and that can get really confusing. In non-friction the story most likely always makes sense. So i believe that non-fiction is a little more interested and sometimes makes a little more sense then fiction.
I find fiction more "exciting" to read because an author is able to express a fantasy incorporating ideas without the constrain of whether it is true information or false, not implying that non-fiction is uninteresting. In fiction writing, your imagination takes control and gets your mind jogging so you think creative ideas of what happens next because you can never know what happens next(in a fiction).
In non-fiction, you follow a story of a real person as they participate in real events. If you are familiar with the events of that time period, you most likely know how the story will end. Even though you may not know the exact premises of that particular story, it is still a bit of a wreck to the ending.
On the other hand, fiction is most likely set in another world that is fantastic and sets the mind aflame with intrigue and awe. You settle into the story, are wrapped up in it, and become embroiled in its plot twists and characters. You feel that you can get closer to the characters also.
Nonfiction is more exciting to read because it's things that have happened either present day or in the past. In my point of view these stories let you know more about events. Once you read stories with historic events in them it gives you a little more knowledge on what is happening around you. I do understand that people like fiction because it takes them out of the world for a short period of time, but once there out of that other "world" then their stuck in the normal everyday world that they know nothing about.
Non-fiction is easier to relate to too. Maybe something happened that you didn't know about has happened to you before.
I prefer nonfiction because it gives me the chance to read about stories and event that had occurred before I was alive. The other stories I prefer are the ones where you can relate to like within real life situations and sometimes it will give the reader a chance to see what is going on around them. It makes you think about things differently than how you already are thinking. Also when I'm reading something I prefer for the text to be real rather than made up or pretend.
I like fiction better because of the fact that there are no restrictions. In fiction we are not bound by reality and can have anything happen. This is not to say that I don't like non-fiction, but in fiction anything could happen. In a non-fiction story if a person fall of a cliff they are pretty much dead, but in non-fiction a giant flying octopus being ridden bye George Washington could come to save the day as they are being chased by Darth Vader and Godzilla. I must say this option is not likely, but it is more interesting.
i prefer to read fiction because i would hate having to sit there and read a book of all facts i would rather read something that isnt true because it would be more interesting. fiction can be anything you want pritty much cause its not real so u could just find a book that will make u actually want to read on intsead of just reading a book on facts that most people already know
well honestly, i don't like reading in general. If i had to, I would rather have a fiction, but based on a true story. I think that sometimes nonfiction can be extremely boring, and i lose interest very fast. Fiction, sometimes can get carried away. For example, like when aliens and monsters come into the story, it just makes it flat out stupid. Like a story is better if it could be a real situation, but you rarely ever hear about it. I think it just depends on the story itself. Like, if there was a nonfiction story on a murder case in CT, that would be more interesting then a monster in a closet. However, if there was a nonfiction story on a writer's new book, against a fiction where some one gets kidnapped. I'm neutral in this situation, but I think fiction most of the time is a better thing to read.
I would prefer to read nonfiction. When reading nonfiction you can learn new things, and in the future you can relate them to your life. When you read fiction it could teach you something, but you can't really realistically connect to it, because it isn't real. Fiction isn't as educational, that's why i like nonfiction.